Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Joshua Lavender's avatar

At a certain point in arguing with intransigent people, you realize they’re unreasonable on this topic and no evidence, no matter how plentiful or how good, will ever convince them. And that’s flerfers at this point — a crowd of people not worth talking to, because they won’t engage in good faith.

An example is the flerfer saying the 24-hour sun in Antarctica means nothing and the other saying he doesn’t know what it means. Okay, then why did you guys even come? If you weren’t going to respect the results, i.e. this result means this and that result means that, why did you participate in the experiment at all? Do you think a scientist just changes his mind about what results mean when he doesn’t like the results he gets?!

No point talking to such people. Walk away. That’s it.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts