Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Joshua Lavender's avatar

This had me intrigued right up until I read the words "love triangle." The follow-up explanation doesn't really make it sound any different from love triangles in other YA dystopia. At this point, it's not just a trope of the genre. It's a cliche. I'm not opposed to love triangles per se, but in this genre, one really needs to stand out from the crowd. I'm not seeing that here yet.

One of the heroine's love interests is a golden boy, so by simple contrast, the other must be the underdog. Oh jeez, who's a wolf in sheep's clothing, and who, oh, who shall I root for? I'm totally stumped! The problem with this setup is that it offers only four possible outcomes, all of them unsatisfying: (1) The golden boy is the wolf. Predictable. (2) The underdog is the wolf. Undercuts the dystopia. Whether or not the author intends it, readers will take the underdog to represent an oppressed underclass. I mean, obviously the golden boy represents the ruling elite, right? (3) The heroine rejects them both. Why have a love story at all? (4) The heroine embraces polyamory and accepts them both. Enterprising, but all the tension flies out of the love story.

Why do YA dystopia authors keep falling back on this? I suspect three culprits: (A) Something is missing elsewhere in the story -- depth in characters, tension in the plot, or a coherent "point" to the dystopia. The love triangle is a stopgap. (B) Lazy copycatting. This is just how it's done now in YA dystopia, isn't it? (C) A lack of imagination about what matters to the protagonist. What else can a fourteen-year-old girl have on her mind than which of her crushes she's going to hook up with?

I'm not claiming this book is necessarily guilty of any of that. I'm saying, having seen so much YA dystopia be guilty of one or more of those things, as a reader I've got to be convinced I won't see the same problems again. Fair or not, a love triangle is an automatic strike against a YA dystopia. Nothing in your review nullified it for me.

Why the diatribe? I love dystopia, I write dystopia, and I want to read new dystopia. The genre is stagnating, though. The "tropes" (cliches) have made it so. Love triangles, oligarchic corporation-states, maverick "visionaries" who turn out to be madmen, genetic engineering with a fatal flaw that turns out to be intentionally designed to breed a superhuman race of elites, etc. I'm tired of writers who can't move beyond this stuff and publishers who won't publish anything else.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts